35 MPG, or bust!
December 19, 2007 - By John LeBlanc
Chevrolet’s just-launched Tahoe Hybrid
and its planned rear-wheel drive Impala are only two General Motors
vehicles that may not make the grade, should a proposed fuel economy
bill in the U.S. be passed into law.
As a member of the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, GM endorsed the U.S. government’s proposed energy bill, which could see new vehicle fuel economy standards increase by 40 per cent to 8.0 L/100 km between 2011 to 2020.
According to GM vice-chair Bob Lutz, the new legislation, which would ultimately also affect vehicles sold in Canada, will wreak havoc with the automaker’s existing product plans.
In an interview with straight-six.com, Lutz said that “it looks like this 35 m.p.g. (6.7 L /100 km) rule will go through. Which means, frankly, a lot more work on our part.”
Despite decades of customers wanting better fuel economy in their vehicles — even before the recent rise in fuel prices and growing awareness of global warming — Lutz seemed surprised that the legislation is an impending reality and warned of the higher cost.
“All of this new technology we’ll need to get there won’t come for free,” he said.
For example, Chevrolet’s new Tahoe Hybrid, the world’s first full-size gasoline electric hybrid, gets real-world fuel consumption ratings of around 10 L/ 100 km. That’s a 25 per cent better combined city/highway fuel economy than the gas-only version, but its price starts at $50,490 in the U.S., about a $10,000 premium over a comparable gas-only version.
Lutz went on to say that automakers simply can’t make a large SUV deliver the proposed 8.0 L/100 km regulation.
To many Canadians who have already made the decision to go with right-sized vehicles, Lutz may have answered his own question.
“Unless we force our (large SUV) customers into a (compact Chevrolet) HHR-sized vehicle, we can’t (meet the new law’s requirements),” said Lutz.
Lutz also speculated that it is questionable whether any of the proposed vehicles on GM’s rear-drive global platform, like a new Impala, will ever be brought to market.
Lincoln learns its ABCs
Despite continued criticism for throwing away decades of brand equity by ditching iconic model names such as Continental, Lincoln will continue its alphabetic naming plan on new vehicles.
According to Automotive News, executives Lincoln say the next alpha-named vehicle at Ford’s American luxury brand will be its version of Ford’s Flex crossover, due sometime in 2009.
Lincoln’s name game started two years ago.
The Ford Fusion-based Zephyr was rebadged MKZ (pronounced Em-Kay-Zed) in 2006 after being introduced to the market earlier. It was followed by the MKX last year, the mid-size crossover that replaced the Aviator.
Lincoln’s yet-to-be-named Flex clone will be the next model in line after next summer’s launch of the MKS flagship luxury sedan, revealed last month at the Los Angeles auto show.
Ironically Lincoln is sticking with Navigator for its full-size SUV and Town Car for its full-size sedan/limousine.
In the past, Ford CEO Alan Mulally has criticized the company for switching vehicle names too often, abandoning “heritage nameplates” such as Taurus.
Lincoln’s argument is that its MK-Whatever naming system matches up with other luxury brand’s strategies, the grand daddy of which is Mercedes-Benz.
Acura cited the same reasons as Lincoln when they switched to letters and numbers in the naming of its products.
Despite a strong start for the Acura brand as the first Japanese premium brand, the Honda-owned division lost market share in the 1990s. During the same period, Acura changed to alphanumerics, dropping the well-known Legend and Integra badges.
Mike Richards, Lincoln Mercury general marketing manager, said, "It's costly to brand every single horse in the stable, as opposed to just branding the entire primary brand."
If Lincoln had stuck with Continental, Zephyr, and Aviator, or applied some of its recent concept car names like Vignale and Sentinel, maybe we wouldn’t be having this critique and Lincoln would have saved a few dollars along the way.
- John LeBlanc, Publisher
As a member of the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, GM endorsed the U.S. government’s proposed energy bill, which could see new vehicle fuel economy standards increase by 40 per cent to 8.0 L/100 km between 2011 to 2020.
According to GM vice-chair Bob Lutz, the new legislation, which would ultimately also affect vehicles sold in Canada, will wreak havoc with the automaker’s existing product plans.
In an interview with straight-six.com, Lutz said that “it looks like this 35 m.p.g. (6.7 L /100 km) rule will go through. Which means, frankly, a lot more work on our part.”
Despite decades of customers wanting better fuel economy in their vehicles — even before the recent rise in fuel prices and growing awareness of global warming — Lutz seemed surprised that the legislation is an impending reality and warned of the higher cost.
“All of this new technology we’ll need to get there won’t come for free,” he said.
For example, Chevrolet’s new Tahoe Hybrid, the world’s first full-size gasoline electric hybrid, gets real-world fuel consumption ratings of around 10 L/ 100 km. That’s a 25 per cent better combined city/highway fuel economy than the gas-only version, but its price starts at $50,490 in the U.S., about a $10,000 premium over a comparable gas-only version.
Lutz went on to say that automakers simply can’t make a large SUV deliver the proposed 8.0 L/100 km regulation.
To many Canadians who have already made the decision to go with right-sized vehicles, Lutz may have answered his own question.
“Unless we force our (large SUV) customers into a (compact Chevrolet) HHR-sized vehicle, we can’t (meet the new law’s requirements),” said Lutz.
Lutz also speculated that it is questionable whether any of the proposed vehicles on GM’s rear-drive global platform, like a new Impala, will ever be brought to market.
Lincoln learns its ABCs
Despite continued criticism for throwing away decades of brand equity by ditching iconic model names such as Continental, Lincoln will continue its alphabetic naming plan on new vehicles.
According to Automotive News, executives Lincoln say the next alpha-named vehicle at Ford’s American luxury brand will be its version of Ford’s Flex crossover, due sometime in 2009.
Lincoln’s name game started two years ago.
The Ford Fusion-based Zephyr was rebadged MKZ (pronounced Em-Kay-Zed) in 2006 after being introduced to the market earlier. It was followed by the MKX last year, the mid-size crossover that replaced the Aviator.
Lincoln’s yet-to-be-named Flex clone will be the next model in line after next summer’s launch of the MKS flagship luxury sedan, revealed last month at the Los Angeles auto show.
Ironically Lincoln is sticking with Navigator for its full-size SUV and Town Car for its full-size sedan/limousine.
In the past, Ford CEO Alan Mulally has criticized the company for switching vehicle names too often, abandoning “heritage nameplates” such as Taurus.
Lincoln’s argument is that its MK-Whatever naming system matches up with other luxury brand’s strategies, the grand daddy of which is Mercedes-Benz.
Acura cited the same reasons as Lincoln when they switched to letters and numbers in the naming of its products.
Despite a strong start for the Acura brand as the first Japanese premium brand, the Honda-owned division lost market share in the 1990s. During the same period, Acura changed to alphanumerics, dropping the well-known Legend and Integra badges.
Mike Richards, Lincoln Mercury general marketing manager, said, "It's costly to brand every single horse in the stable, as opposed to just branding the entire primary brand."
If Lincoln had stuck with Continental, Zephyr, and Aviator, or applied some of its recent concept car names like Vignale and Sentinel, maybe we wouldn’t be having this critique and Lincoln would have saved a few dollars along the way.
- John LeBlanc, Publisher
the Crank 107: Au revoir, ecoAUTO...
the Crank 106: Wagons ho!
the Crank 105: Show Wars
the Crank 104:
Neutered muscle car, or the best of both worlds?
the Crank 103:
Little Tatas, huge hype
the Crank 102:
The mouse speaks
the Crank 101:
Future shock
the Crank 100:
Looking for change in Detroit
this year?
the Crank #99:
'Tis the season...
the Crank #98:
35 MPG, or bust!
the Crank #97:
Knightrider gets a pony
the Crank #96:
Depreciation: The silent killer
the Crank #95:
The Best American car ever?
the Crank #94:
L.A. versus Detroit—Highlights at 11
the Crank #93:
Update: Cross-border shopping
the Crank #92:
Is the reborn, rear-drive Impala dead?
the Crank #91: Are car makers blind?
the Crank #90:
Cross-border car shopping
the Crank #89:
Subaru's doin' diesels & Toyota's troubles with Tundra
the Crank #88:
Just what we need, more brands
the Crank #87:
Is Honda's new CR-Z doomed?
the Crank #86:
Women on women on cars
the Crank #85:
Ford's furious Focus fixes
the Crank #84:
At VW, which way is up?
the Crank #83:
Frankfurt 2007 -
Making sense of the chaos
the Crank #82:
Frankfurt 2007 -
Vive la difference!
the Crank #81:
Fool me thrice
the Crank #80:
There are knowns...
the Crank #79:
Import vs. Domestic—Who cares?
the Crank #78:
New Impreza's confounding looks
the Crank #77:
Walmart Wheels
the Crank #76:
Chrysler's close call
the Crank #75:
Hybrids losing steam
the Crank #74:
Chinese fireworks
the Crank #73:
Conceptually speaking...
the Crank #72:
If a Lincoln starts every time, does anyone care?
The Crank #71:
Why Kubica's crash was a no brainer
The Crank #70:
Kia's getting faster, maybe even more furious, too
the CRANK #69:
The New Chrysler:Now what?
the CRANK #68:
Is the retro Nitro a detour?
the CRANK #67:
Cheap gas is killing the planet
the Crank #66:
Youze either go big—or fuhgeddaboutit!—in the Big Apple
the Crank #65:
Detroit 2007: Hits & Misses…
the CRANK #64:
Au revoir, JV?
the CRANK #63:
Diesel destiny
the CRANK #62:
That '70s Car Company
the CRANK #61:
Idiots in Porsches, no more
the CRANK #60:
If you love somebody,
set them free
the CRANK #59:
RSX, R.I.P.
the CRANK #58:
Kia's Power of Hype
the CRANK #57:
Smaller Saturn sunk
the CRANK #56:
Dammit, I want that Super Licence!
the CRANK #55:
Brand Bastards II
the CRANK #54:
Sanity, lunacy and death
the CRANK #53:
Invisible Cars
the CRANK #52:
How did Smart get so dumb?
the CRANK #51:
It's not the country, it's the car
the CRANK #50:
It ain't easy being green.
the CRANK #49:
Challenger, Camaro: Build or bust?
the CRANK #48:
The General's Adult Playground
the CRANK #47:
Lotus blooms in Canada
the CRANK #46:
2005: The Underdogs
the CRANK #45:
The Top Three for Oh-Five
the CRANK #44:
This just in: Styling sells cars...
the CRANK #43:
Welcome to Planet Toyota
the CRANK #42:
Spied: The new Volkswagen Fez
The CRANK #41:
There’s new, and then there’s the best
the CRANK #40:
You can cancel that Monster Zed order...
the CRANK #39 -
Can Audi make 10 go into 3?
the CRANK #38 -
The SRT gang strike again
the CRANK #37 -
Monkey SEMA, monkey do
the CRANK #36 -
Mmm, mmm, Five!
the CRANK #35 -
I get a Hummer
the CRANK #34:
It’s the product, stupid!
the CRANK #33 -
Stiff, or Stanfield?
the CRANK #32 -
Bricklin's Back, sort of...
the CRANK #31 -
The General's Naming Games
the CRANK #30-
What was hot, and not, in 2004
the CRANK #29 -
2005 Canadian Car of the Year – NOT!
the CRANK #28 -
The air is certainly different on Planet Saturn
the CRANK #27 -
Unrequited love
the CRANK #26 -
Why Acura has it backwards
the CRANK #25 -
Bringing up the rear
the CRANK #24 -
An American Revolution in badging only
the CRANK #23 -
Rookie Review
the CRANK #22 -
Detroit's short term sales gain is turning into a long term brand pain
the CRANK #21 -
How do you like your Japanese meatballs?"
the CRANK #20 -
Our "car of the year", "ten best", "all-star" blow out
the CRANK #19 -
Psycho-Brits, qu'est-ce que?
the CRANK #18 -
An old ice racer learns new tricks
the CRANK #17 -
The Answer Man responds to your burning questions
the CRANK #16 -
Mercedes Benz E Class: A Driving Odyssey
the CRANK #15 -
Trading in Pontiac's spear for Alfa Romeo's shield
the CRANK #14 -
For the love of driving
the CRANK #13 -
Hey, MG Rover, don't bother coming over
the CRANK #12 -
The Death of the American Car
the CRANK #11 -
Brand Bastards
the CRANK #10-
Dude, where's my Vibe?
the CRANK #09 -
Bigger Door Beams Versus Better Drivers
the CRANK #07 -
Herr Piech proves that after V comes W
the CRANK #06 -
Robert & Me
the CRANK #05 -
No humbug here, I love Speedvision
the CRANK #04 -
Zero-percent financing plus zero sales = big trouble

